We performed a comparison between Sophos SafeGuard, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, and WinMagic SecureDoc based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption."The advantage of Sophos SafeGuard stems from the fact that it is more secure than other products in the market."
"The solution can be easily connected and it is very secure."
"I like the support most of all."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the GUI is easy to use."
"The features that I have found most valuable are encryption tools that encrypt the hard disk and the USB sticks."
"The intrusion detection system."
"It's the best solution on the market."
"What I love most about Sophos SafeGuard is its user-friendly interface. My company has another software with a complex user interface versus Sophos SafeGuard, which is extremely easy to use."
"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."
"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."
"In general terms, it is working properly and according to our expectations. The comfort of feeling secure is the most valuable. Some customers had certain fears about changing the product because no one wants to lose any kind of information or to have some problems or inconsistencies while migrating from one product to another."
"You get updates and other encrypted files easily."
"It has reduced the number of incidents related to the loss of information."
"It is fairly stable."
"The most valuable features are the messaging features and shared folders."
"The management console gives us the ability to quickly control who sees what, ensures we are on the latest version, and up-to-date."
"The Central Management server."
"The dashboards lack sufficient information."
"What would make Sophos SafeGuard better than competitors is if its management console also includes firewall management. In the future, I want Sophos SafeGuard to be more scalable."
"The solution lacks direct connectivity to Azure AD."
"The product is not cheap."
"The security does not have 100% authentication."
"The integration could be a little better."
"The tutorials need to be simplified. The existing ones need to be easier to follow and we could use some tutorials for basic setups. They should aim to be more like Cisco, which offers very good tutorials and materials."
"The solution's ability to integrate with other solutions, such as a DLP, should be addressed."
"We would like some advanced security protection features."
"I can only patch monthly. I don't know what the solution is there, besides being vulnerable for three weeks out of four. But there's got to be an option somehow."
"Its decryption time needs to be improved. Currently, its decryption time is very long, and it takes double time than encryption. They need to work on that. Its encryption time is fine."
"One feature that is lacking is integration with Symantec Information Centric (ICT). As it is now, I don't see how to integrate the encryption with ICT, and in my opinion this is an area that certainly requires encryption, even though it's no longer supported by Broadcom."
"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."
"The product can be expensive. Price was a factor in moving away from the product."
"I do not find the environment to be very user-friendly."
"They have too high of a price tag. That's why they're losing the market share."
"MacOS X is missing features."
Earn 20 points
