We performed a comparison between Infor CloudSuite Industrial, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."It is a scalable solution."
"We did some research and chose CloudSuite because it has the flexibility to cover a range of areas. And there were many other factors like traceability, for example, which is crucial for food production."
"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."
"The product's most valuable feature is production planning. It is one of the core features."
"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."
"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."
"Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."
"The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"The solution is stable."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"The initial setup is easy - because it stands on Microsoft offerings, it's simple and intuitive to use."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV's most valuable feature is the integration with other Microsoft solutions."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"One developer is enough to maintain the solution. Microsoft 365 is changing technology. The product is a user-friendly ERP solution."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is the Teams application. I use Teams to share documents amongst my team members, have meetings, and talk to them."
"Its most valuable feature is the user interface."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The solution makes everything organized for my organization or enterprise. It makes workflows more than clear."
"Planning needs to be improved. That is, industry-specific planning details need to be added and refined."
"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."
"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."
"Pricing is always an area where there is room for improvement."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."
"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"I would like a more modular and user-friendly interface."
"I wouldn't say that Microsoft Dynamics is very scalable."
"The solution's event management can be improved."
"The UI is not particularly user-friendly and the CRM could do with some enhancements."
"Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central has been buggy in my experience and they should improve in this area. Additionally, there are too many updates. The updates involve a whole bunch of applications as part of the package, such as the Edge browser. The updates are too broad across the whole package of applications."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV could improve the reporting."
"The Power BI integration could be more seamless."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
