We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator, SWIFTnet FIN, and webMethods Trading Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"The solution is useful for transferring files from one format to another format. Also, the solution is useful in translation."
"B2B Integrator is multi-platform, so it can be integrated with Windows, Unix, or whatever, and it can work with almost all programming languages. It can also transfer a lot of data in a short time. For instance, a system I recently implemented exchanges about 20 million files a day."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive."
"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support."
"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."
"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."
"With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."
"There is no related transaction stored in the database because it's an OLTP application."
"Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
"The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough."
"The reporting features could be better. right now, they are lacking a bit."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud."
"I would like for them to work in real-time."
"The solution should include REST API calls."
"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."
Earn 20 points
