We performed a comparison between Microsoft MDS, Profisee, and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software."It's very easy to use."
"The best thing about it is that it comes with the Microsoft package."
"The tool is easy to use."
"Enables non-technical people to directly interact with the BI system."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."
"The most valuable feature is the administration console."
"The solution is easy to install."
"The product is able to utilize the SQL server toolkit and it has tight integration with the SQL server."
"We really like the matching and merging features."
"The process of categorizing data, creating glossaries, and generating metadata is streamlined and less time-consuming."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"The API and the data model are very valuable features."
"The tool's UI is good and easy to understand."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"JMD repositories have records that come in thousands and millions, which takes a long time to process."
"The Microsoft license cost could be lower."
"From my understanding, MS, as of 2021, will not maintain the product going forward."
"The solution could be better integrated into Microsoft's other products."
"Stability can be fragile at times. If you are not attentive or make a mistake, it can cause problems."
"In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure."
"Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions."
"The stability could be improved."
"The way training is laid out in their Profisee University, makes it really, really hard to find what you need fast."
"A more convenient approach would involve integrating all the pre-existing elements into Profisee itself."
"When we updated to version 7.1, there were some workflow issues."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
"The documentation needs improvement."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."