Alfresco vs CA View vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
499 views|398 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
70 views|23 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
349 views|158 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfresco, CA View, and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Document Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product allows engineering teams and developers to introduce new things in a seamless and easy way.""Document repository.""The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata.""I like the ease of use, sections, and calendar."

More Alfresco Pros →

"We standardized our CIS log processing with CA View. We support a whole bunch of LPARs, about 80 or so. When we go to an LPAR, we know just where the CIS log is, it's in CA View, and we know how to get to it, we don't have to search around for it.""It's easy to add more space to it when you need and to. If you're producing large reports it's easy to increase so you can handle the new volume that may come along."

More CA View Pros →

"I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good.""We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan.""It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn.""An advantage is integration with your IP directory.""The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management.""The product can be integrated with different solutions."

More OpenText Content Manager Pros →

Cons
"Alfresco has a very steep learning curve, and unfortunately, during the learning process, it's very easy to make errors, which often are unforgiving.""I would like them to consider document capture functionality.""Metadata, auto class, disposition log, and legal hold.""I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."

More Alfresco Cons →

"I believe they do probably have a GUI interface for the laptop, so you can just use the interface instead of the mainframe ISPF interface. I think that's already available but, if not, that would be my only issue.""There was one customer we were trying convert over, and it was complicated. There were retention criteria which seemed a little more limited than with some of the other products."

More CA View Cons →

"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made.""The product could improve its scalability.""Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find.""OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier.""The ease of use should be addressed.""Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."

More OpenText Content Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is cheaper compared to head-to-head competitors."
  • "There are costs for any upgrade or additional functions."
  • "If you buy Alfresco through a partner, there is usually a OEM licensing option."
  • "The license for Alfresco is expensive - not the maximum, but close. There are also extra costs once you start building integrations, as implementation seems to be very costly."
  • More Alfresco Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It requires other pieces of CA software and license keys, thing like that. That's one thing to keep in mind. It requires CA Common Services in order to actually be licensed to run on LPAR."
  • More CA View Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."
  • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata.
    Top Answer:The license for Alfresco is expensive - not the maximum, but close. There are also extra costs once you start building… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money… more »
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    499
    Comparisons
    398
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    70
    Comparisons
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    349
    Comparisons
    158
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Unicenter CA-View Output Archival and Viewing
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Alfresco Digital Business Platform offers open, secure content services to let you unlock the value from your most important business information. Give users access to their content wherever and however they work with Alfresco’s open, flexible, and highly scalable cloud-native content services platform. Easily integrate and connect with everyday business applications. Find, view, collaborate on, govern, and securely share digital content—and get information to the right person at the right time.

    CA View is an automated archival and retrieval system that provides immediate and flexible online viewing of mainframe and distributed output. Its repository is capable of housing many types of documents and file types to give you an easy mechanism for selectively viewing and managing a variety of data types. CA View integrates with other solutions to automate the flow of reports between mainframe and distributed platforms, offering a solution that grows with changing business needs.

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    Sample Customers
    Over 1,300 companies from 180 different countries. Including EuroStar, Saks Fifth Avenue, NASA Langley Research Center, and KLM.
    DHL, Intergrupo
    Missouri State Courts
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business80%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Document Management Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.