I typically note a three-year ROI.

The benefit of the product stems from the reliability and the dependability offered. You need to learn to be satisfied with the product, and it is not worth worrying until everything becomes bad with the product.

The ROI is huge and I was surprised after seeing it when the environment was set up and stable.

Having experience with the product for over 5 years, the ROI is definitely over our expectations. The level of performance improvement has increased in such a way that we are able to scale up with the ability to process more data (faster), making our customers happy with the output. 

From a return on investment perspective, Cisco UCS B-Series is worth the money.

ROI is not something we share, but I will note that we now use 2 persons to manage 1600 servers in two remote data centers. This is across 25 domains that can all be seen at once and, as alerts come in, drilled down and addressed from a web console.

I have seen a return on investment. 

We have received a strong return on investment.

We haven't had a full life span on the Cisco UCS but so far we have not had to do nearly as much firmware maintenance as the HP Servers.

We have seen an ROI and would recommend the solution based on those observations.

It's a win-win situation for both customers and vendors due to its features.