Given our government-mandated budget constraints, the design and deployment of our wireless infrastructure with Cisco Wireless have provided significant flexibility in reallocating funds within our organization. 

Cisco is good but it expensive. That's why for me there is no better.

Cisco Wireless has saved us some costs because you don't need to provision network points for every new staff. All we do is give the staff an IT work tool, such as a wireless laptop or a wireless computer, and they can be part of the network as soon as possible.

We have definitely received a return on our investment because the major part of any wireless solution is the quality of connectivity. When you have good connectivity, you can access the environment, go inside the network and access production resources from a mobile device sitting basically anywhere. 

Two days is not enough to see ROI.

But for the previous experience, yes, I can see ROI. The old access points stayed with us since 2015. I have some working since 2017. I removed some from the system, so I have all 2017 access points still working. That is quite a reliable system.

I think we got our ROI within a year.

We don't really see Cisco as a solution that provides an ROI. It's more of a required service for us. 

The increased productivity and low downtime from the wireless network is worth every cent spent. The different teams can roam the building while staying connected.....100%

The ROI is excellent.

The ROI generally takes four to five years.

We are a non-profit organisation. ROI was not the main drive to buy this product as manageability and reliability were.

The ROI is good because the stability is so good from Cisco.

High.