• Home
  • Alfresco vs. Objective ECM

Alfresco vs Objective ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
Alfresco
Read 10 Alfresco reviews
3,019 views|2,415 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Objective Logo
Objective ECM
Read 1 Objective ECM review
547 views|501 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alfresco and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Karthi Keyan
Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft
Anonymous User
The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is cheaper compared to head-to-head competitors."
  • "There are costs for any upgrade or additional functions."
  • "If you buy Alfresco through a partner, there is usually a OEM licensing option."
  • "The license for Alfresco is expensive - not the maximum, but close. There are also extra costs once you start building integrations, as implementation seems to be very costly."

    • More Alfresco Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Would Alfresco give an organization more benefits in terms of cost, featu...
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What do you like most about Alfresco?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alfresco?
    Top Answer:The license for Alfresco is expensive - not the maximum, but close. There are also extra costs once you start building integrations, as implementation seems to be very costly.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    3,019
    Comparisons
    2,415
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    6.0
    17th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    547
    Comparisons
    501
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Hyland
    Objective
    Overview

    The Alfresco Digital Business Platform offers open, secure content services to let you unlock the value from your most important business information. Give users access to their content wherever and however they work with Alfresco’s open, flexible, and highly scalable cloud-native content services platform. Easily integrate and connect with everyday business applications. Find, view, collaborate on, govern, and securely share digital content—and get information to the right person at the right time.

    Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

    Sample Customers
    Over 1,300 companies from 180 different countries. Including EuroStar, Saks Fifth Avenue, NASA Langley Research Center, and KLM.
    ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government32%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business80%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alfresco is ranked 9th in Enterprise Content Management with 10 reviews while Objective ECM is ranked 17th in Enterprise Content Management. Alfresco is rated 8.0, while Objective ECM is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Alfresco writes "Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". Alfresco is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, OpenText Documentum and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.