We performed a comparison between Appian and ELMA 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Appian helps you do a lot of things. It's easy to configure and build an application platform, and it offers a lot of features that you find in an RPA solution. It's flexible so you can reuse it for a variety of use cases."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"Appian is a very low code platform. It's very easy to learn and use."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"This is the most complete solution of its kind."
"We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features."
"A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively."
"While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"Customers want improved productivity."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while ELMA 365 is ranked 47th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.4, while ELMA 365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, Camunda and Bizagi.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.