We performed a comparison between Appian and CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"The setup is easy."
"The tech support is quite good."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features."
"The most valuable feature is business automation."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually."
"The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features."
"If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything."
"It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected."
More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 3rd in Process Automation with 57 reviews while CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation. Appian is rated 8.4, while CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.