We performed a comparison between Mobius Content Services Platform and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"The vertical application could be improved."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.