We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"It has a very intuitive user interface, which every user able to manage the basic functionality of a PC will be able to work with and produce quite satisfactory results."
"The scalability is enough for our use cases. It covers all our needs."
"Confluence can link any ticket or task from JIRA to be included on the Confluence page."
"It's extremely intuitive."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"I love the reports and the Confluence board."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"The overall functions are good."
"The entire product is good."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"Some elements of the user interface could be more user-friendly, including embedding diagrams."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"I would like to see more macros provided by the company included in the license."
"I would like Confluence to include the ability to draw flowcharts and diagrams."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"When you are creating a table in Confluence, there is no tool to export it into Excel sheet for quick references. We can only export it as an a PDF file, but not into an editable file."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Drupal and SharePoint. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
