We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"Bizagi is really great for beginners because it's user-friendly and you can learn in it quickly, whereas other similar software are harder."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"The most beneficial features of Bizagi for our business processes are its seamless connectivity between process elements and its ability to automate tasks and perform simulations."
"The most valuable feature is the simulation."
"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"Enhancing data generation methods for easier printing and refining the file attachment and user interface to optimize usability."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."
"It would be helpful if they added some extra features in the next update."
"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."
AuraQuantic is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian and Camunda, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA. See our AuraQuantic vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
