Aurea CX Messenger vs IBM MQ

Aurea CX Messenger is ranked unranked in Business Activity Monitoring with 3 reviews vs IBM MQ which is ranked 1st in Business Activity Monitoring with 80 reviews. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes". The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "When we go to different reports, it queues everything up, waits, and then releases it when we're ready". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and Solace Virtual Message Router. IBM MQ is most compared with RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka and ActiveMQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review

Looking for a deeper dive into
Business Activity Monitoring?

Business activity monitoring report from it central station 2018 05 05 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Quotes From Members Comparing Aurea CX Messenger vs IBM MQ

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.

Read more »

Has helped integrate between applications, reduce rework, and costs by reusing working components of existing applications.Integrates between distributed systems: For example, it can help integrate processing between mainframe, client-server, web-based applications by integrating the messages, supporting Service Oriented Architecture.We have implemented business to business transactions over MQ messaging. The guaranteed and once only delivery ensures business integrity.Reliability is the most valuable feature. MQ is used to support critical business applications.The message queue and the integration with any development platform/language, i.e., NET and Java, are the most valuable features.We use our routing feature when the request is coming from the business application. The request goes to the distributive side and it is routed to the right claim instance.There are a lot of extensible options for security, i.e., various things you can do. It's pretty easy to navigate.It's ability to scale, it's ability to do guaranteed delivery and it's ability to do point-to-point of what we subscribe are the most valuable features.

Read more »

Cons
It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.

Read more »

the level of training as well as product marketing for this product are not that great. You rarely find a good training institute that provides training. Many of the architects in several organization are neither aware of the product nor interested in using it. IBM should provide good training on products like this.It needs a User Interface which is better than the aging MQ Explorer. The existing solution MQ Explorer is outdated.The installation of product upgrades and patches is very difficult. It requires the use of the IBM Installation Manager (IM).Presenting and maybe having some different options for different user experiences based on the administrative duties that you have to do as an app manager or configure the server or security would be an improvement.I would like the ability to connect with some of the more recent offerings, such as API Connect; being able to publish our MQ endpoints, the queues, the messaging infrastructure as IT assets.They need to add the ability to send full messages (header + payload) from the MQ Explorer program, not just the payload.I would just like a more user-friendly experience to do common administration tasks. I know that you can use MQ Explorer, but having something that's already built in would definitely be useful.At a recent conference, I went to a presentation that had the latest version and it has amazing stuff that's coming out. So, I am excited to use those, specifically surrounding the web console and the fact that it's API integrated.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscriptionMuch better than Oracle SOA Suite.

Read more »

Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.Use the new and lightweight version (Liberty) to lower licensing costs. It is also easier to upgrade/maintain.IBM MQ has a flexible license model based on the Processor Value Unit (PVU) and I recommend it.It's super expensive, so ask them if they can consolidate some other licensing costs. But, IBM is IBM, so I guess we'll pay for it.

Read more »

Looking for a deeper dive into
Business Activity Monitoring?

Business activity monitoring report from it central station 2018 05 05 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Ranking
RANKING
Unranked
In Business Activity Monitoring
Views
15,837
Comparisons
9,664
Reviews
80
Followers
734
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Aurea CX Messenger competitors »
Pivotal logo
Compared 42% of the time.
Apache
Compared 22% of the time.
Apache
Compared 7% of the time.
See more IBM MQ competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsCX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQWebSphere MQ
Website/Video
Website/VideoAurea
  • Vendor 28822 screenshot 1525541969
IBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

    IBM MQ provides the universal messaging backbone for service-oriented architecture (SOA) connectivity. It connects virtually any commercial IT system, whether on premise, in the cloud, or a mixture. For more than 20 years IBM has led the market in messaging middleware and more than 10,000 businesses across all geographies and industries rely on IBM MQ.

    Visit for your trial here.

OFFER
Learn more about Aurea CX Messenger
Learn more about IBM MQ
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersHeathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom MortgageDeutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Insurance Company
19%
Retailer
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
43%
Insurance Company
14%
Transportation Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
1%
Midsize Enterprise
12%
Large Enterprise
87%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
5%
Large Enterprise
85%

Looking for a deeper dive into
Business Activity Monitoring?

Business activity monitoring report from it central station 2018 05 05 thumbnailReport download mockup no thumb

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email