We performed a comparison between BIC Platform and IBM Business Automation Workflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to use."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"Its interface is well-designed and user-friendly"
"The most valuable feature is automation, which is quite strong and we are quite happy with it."
"One of the most valuable features is the way that they are adapting to the market. Initially, it was doing only workflow. Now it has started bringing all the other components like rules within the workflow and then the integration with RPA."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"It's a flexible solution."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"From what I understand, in the next release they're actually going to combine all of this together as one integrated solution... If we could have one unified way to build a solution, that would really help."
"One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
BIC Platform is ranked 28th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. BIC Platform is rated 8.2, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, Camunda and ADONIS, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation. See our BIC Platform vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
