Compare BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
 |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time." "BlazeMeter has allowed us to simplify and speed up our load testing process." "I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick." "They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us." | "The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it." "The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way." "The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center." "The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I" |
Cons | |
"My only complaint is about the technical support, where sometimes I found that they would not read into and understand the details of my question before answering it." "A possible improvement could be the integration with APM tools." "In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports." "Having more options for customization would be helpful." | "Improvements to the reporting would be good." "I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point." "There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other." "I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan." | "There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: I really like the recording because when I use the JMeter the scripting a lot of recording it takes me a lot of time to get used to. The BlazeMeter the recording is quick. Top Answer: In terms of improvement, I would like it to have the ability to customize reports. Top Answer: Our primary use case is to create processes for performance. I created a one time function and implemented it for 1,000 users. | Top Answer: The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it. Top Answer: Improvements to the reporting would be good. Technical support can be improved. Top Answer: I have been using LoadRunner Cloud for performance testing. |
Ranking  | |
Views 5,707 Comparisons 4,116 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 261 Rating 8.5 | Views 7,485 Comparisons 4,965 Reviews 6 Average Words per Review 555 Rating 8.2 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 37% of the time. Compared 22% of the time. Compared 13% of the time. Compared 4% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| JMeter Cloud | StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, Micro Focus StormRunner Load, HPE StormRunner Load |
Learn | |
| Broadcom | Micro Focus |
Overview | |
| CA BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery. The rapidly growing CA BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv. | Micro Focus StormRunner Load is a simple, smart and scalable solution for Agile Cloud testing. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions. |
Offer | |
Learn more about BlazeMeter | Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud |
Sample Customers | |
| DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub | N Brown Group, aHOC |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider14% Financial Services Firm7% Media Company7% | Educational Organization50% Financial Services Firm25% Engineering Company13% Retailer13% Computer Software Company47% Comms Service Provider11% Financial Services Firm6% Insurance Company6% |
Company Size | |
Small Business64% Midsize Enterprise7% Large Enterprise29% | Small Business23% Midsize Enterprise27% Large Enterprise50% |
Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BlazeMeter is ranked 6th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 4 reviews. BlazeMeter is rated 8.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BlazeMeter writes "Enables us to monitor our application instances as well as our database to see where the bottlenecks are". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Offers good record and playback and endurance features ". BlazeMeter is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Neotys NeoLoad, Tricentis Flood and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Apache JMeter, Neotys NeoLoad and Akamai CloudTest. See our BlazeMeter vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud report.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.