We performed a comparison between Bonita and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."
"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."
"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."
"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."
"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"The solution is easy to use."
"vCenter Orchestrator's best features are the workflows, integration with third-party applications, and the workflow library."
"The backup and recovery times are very quick."
"The DRS feature from VMware is very valuable to us because it balances workloads."
"The most valuable feature is how easy it makes it to manage the VM."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The hardware abstraction layer, being able to make the VMs portable when moving to a different platform or over a WAN."
"Because of the central management, the scripting engine and workflow engine are integrated with VMware without any burden to integrate different products."
"We can scale the solution."
"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."
"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."
"The dashboard has limited features."
"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."
"Installation could be made easier."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"I would like to see more automation added in the future."
"A feature to review and setup tasks should be added."
"There are no good manuals or guidelines on integrations. Hence, you need to be asking someone."
"The product lacks GUIs. The tool should have more GUIs available, along with easier product documentation."
"The product’s cost needs improvement."
"The solution's price could be cheaper."
"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved."
"Many times, customers' licenses are not used because the client is not aware of the features and the product benefits. When somebody is buying a product, they just do a default configuration."
Bonita is ranked 12th in Process Automation with 27 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. Bonita is rated 8.2, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and ProcessMaker, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Bonita vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
