Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"The solution is scalable."
"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."
"Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great."
"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."
"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."
"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."
"The content management is great."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."
"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."
"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"
"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."
"Once a workflow is launched then it stays static forever, which is a problem because if there is a change in the business then you cannot change the workflow."
"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."
"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well.
Top Answer: Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive. Two models are available and it depends on which one you are using.
out of 78 in Business Process Management
Average Words per Review
out of 78 in Business Process Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 62% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
|Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager|
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.
Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
|IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.|
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about IBM Case Foundation
|AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent||Suncorp Group Limited|
Financial Services Firm31%
Comms Service Provider23%
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm11%
No Data Available
Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 19 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 14th in Business Process Management with 7 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 7.8, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "Component reusability saves us development time, but the learning curve is too steep". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Harness and integrate unstructured information with business processes". Camunda BPM is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Bizagi, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM and OpenText 360 for SharePoint. See our Camunda BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation report.
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.