Compare Camunda BPM vs. IBM Case Foundation

Camunda BPM is ranked 4th in Business Process Management with 10 reviews while IBM Case Foundation is ranked 29th in Business Process Management with 1 review. Camunda BPM is rated 8.0, while IBM Case Foundation is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "BPMN 2.0 compliant, and the fact it's open source enables us to modify functionality, add features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Provides capability for system integrations, but the multiple workflow apps need to be merged". Camunda BPM is most compared with Bonita, IBM BPM and Bizagi, whereas IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda BPM and Pega BPM.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
24,058 views|15,939 comparisons
IBM Case Foundation Logo
1,018 views|831 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Comindware, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.

Read more »

It provides us the capability of producing b​​usiness processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository.

Read more »

Cons
I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them.When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved.The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options.If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.

Read more »

​The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
24,058
Comparisons
15,939
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
516
Avg. Rating
7.9
Views
1,018
Comparisons
831
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
245
Avg. Rating
6.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 78% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
Learn
camunda
IBM
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.
Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about IBM Case Foundation
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentSuncorp Group Limited
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Profit29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Construction Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise80%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Comindware, Software AG and others in Business Process Management. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email