Compare Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly." "We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users." "I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features." "The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read." "When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version." "The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part." "The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand." "It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products." | "It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches." "In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible." |
Cons | |
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options." "When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved." "I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them." "I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution." "I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs." "I would also like a very easy to use form builder." "Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance." "If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map." | "They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them." "They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"We are using the open-source version of this solution." "Camunda is much cheaper." "I use the open-source free version." "The open-source version of the product is free to use." "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products." "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year." "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost." "I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive." | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: Hi dear knauf
its pleasure to see you in a good position, you were always in the top of specialist.
your advise and solutions make your customer to takeoff their business. | Top Answer: In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to… more » Top Answer: We are an information solutions company. We need a platform where we can connect all the videos through SharePoints and input and export through that. They are not going for any add-ons right now… more » Top Answer: Our primary use case is for providing user profiles. |
Ranking  | |
Views 35,334 Comparisons 23,059 Reviews 19 Average Words per Review 567 Rating 7.9 | Views 1,260 Comparisons 661 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 514 Rating 9.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. | Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360 | |
Learn | |
| camunda | OpenText |
Overview | |
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules. Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
| With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Camunda BPM | Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint |
Sample Customers | |
| AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent | iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA) |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm31% Comms Service Provider23% Non Profit15% Government15% Computer Software Company30% Comms Service Provider20% Financial Services Firm11% Government6% | Computer Software Company31% Insurance Company16% Government13% Comms Service Provider11% |
Company Size | |
Small Business52% Midsize Enterprise17% Large Enterprise31% Small Business13% Midsize Enterprise23% Large Enterprise64% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 19 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 17th in Business Process Management with 2 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 7.8, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "Component reusability saves us development time, but the learning curve is too steep". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". Camunda BPM is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bonita, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Bizagi, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, K2, Pega BPM, webMethods Integration Server and Kofax TotalAgility. See our Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.