Compare Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Camunda BPM is ranked 1st in Business Process Management with 10 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 20th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews. Camunda BPM is rated 8.2, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda BPM writes "A good open-source solution with a robust user community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "You can use all the features without worrying about making the system update patches, all of the issues are taken care of in the cloud version". Camunda BPM is most compared with Bonita, IBM BPM and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Pega BPM, Kofax TotalAgility and IBM BPM. See our Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2020. 407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products. The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand. The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part. When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version. The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read. The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable. I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features. We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users. | In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible. It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches. We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes. |
Cons | |
If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map. Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance. I would also like a very easy to use form builder. I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs. I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution. The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself. I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them. When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved. | They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all. They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them. We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
I use the open-source free version. Camunda is much cheaper. We are using the open-source version of this solution. It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs. 407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 29,064 Comparisons 18,853 Reviews 10 Average Words per Review 517 Avg. Rating 8.1 | Views 1,132 Comparisons 607 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 469 Avg. Rating 8.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. | Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 20% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360 | |
Learn | |
| camunda | OpenText |
Overview | |
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules. Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
| With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Camunda BPM | Learn more about OpenText 360 for SharePoint |
Sample Customers | |
| AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent | iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA) |
Top Industries | |
Non Profit25% Financial Services Firm25% Comms Service Provider13% Government13% Software R&D Company36% Comms Service Provider14% Financial Services Firm7% Government7% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business47% Midsize Enterprise18% Large Enterprise35% Small Business5% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise78% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda BPM vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Camunda BPM Reviews, OpenText 360 for SharePoint Reviews, and our list of Best Business Process Management Companies.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.