We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Denodo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"It has been a stable product."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"This solution provides us with the ability to sync data, and make it available for anyone to use across the business."
"Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"In general, it's good for us to make tests so we can scout the data."
"The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"It can support a number of data sources, and it can pull flat files, from cloud-based databases or from those on-premises. Denodo can pull from any data source and interface with the view. Then, we can publish the view."
"Denodo makes it easy to export data as a service or data link to other services."
"The most valuable features are query optimization and the single language independence from the sources we're using to catch data."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"The git configuration really should be improved."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"The integration could use improvement, it's a lot of non-speed line processes that we have discovered, in the country. The configurations could use a lot more improvement."
"User-specific security at the column and row levels needs to be improved. Instead of applying security at every individual level, it would be better if it were at the group or tier level. It will save a lot of time."
"The dropdown menus feel antiquated to me, and the administrative portals need improvement."
"Denodo can improve usage management-related aspects. If you deal with the mini views, it gets stuck. The performance is very slow when we go with a large number of views and high volume."
"Monitoring event logs can be improved. In the older version, there was a monitoring schedule to get event reports and properly audit the reports. In the newer version, it is not there, and we have to manually configure data and audit events."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Denodo is ranked 1st in Data Virtualization with 29 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Denodo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform and Informatica PowerCenter. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Denodo report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
