Compare DNIF vs. One Identity Safeguard

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DNIF Logo
Read 1 DNIF review.
2,212 views|1,419 comparisons
One Identity Safeguard Logo
4,700 views|1,755 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, One Identity, Splunk and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

More DNIF Pros »

"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between.""The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests.""The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution.""It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage.""The technical support is tremendous.""The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly.""The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy.""The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."

More One Identity Safeguard Pros »

Cons
"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

More DNIF Cons »

"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy.""We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates.""On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight.""The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another.""The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems.""Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support.""I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated.""The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

More One Identity Safeguard Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.""Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis.""It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated.""They offer a fair price for a robust solution.""The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.""It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody.""The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs.""We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

More One Identity Safeguard Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The Transparent Mode is the number one advantage of the product.
Top Answer: The approximate cost on a yearly basis is in the ballpark of about 80 grand, $80,000. That is for about 100 servers. That is the standard license fee. There are not really any additional costs once… more »
Top Answer: The only part of the Safeguard solution that I think could be a problem over time is the amount of storage it takes in the sessions. For example, because it records in real-time video it takes a lot… more »
Ranking
Views
2,212
Comparisons
1,419
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
990
Rating
7.0
Views
4,700
Comparisons
1,755
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
1,060
Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

DNIF offers solutions to the world’s most challenging cybersecurity problems. Recognized by Gartner and used by some of the well-known global companies like PwC, Vodafone and Tata, this next generation analytics platform combines Security and Big Data Analytics to provide real-time threat detection and analytics to the most critical data assets on the Internet. With over a decade of experience in threat detection systems, DNIF has one of the fastest query response times and bridges the gap between searching, processing, analyzing and visualizing data thereby enabling companies with better SOC (Security Operations Center) management.

One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics.

Offer
Learn more about DNIF
Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access

Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard.

Sample Customers
Vodafone India, IDEA Cellular, RBL Bank, NCDEX, NSE
Cavium
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider30%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm60%
Healthcare Company20%
University10%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise43%
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, One Identity, Splunk and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DNIF is ranked 12th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 2nd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 15 reviews. DNIF is rated 6.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of DNIF writes "Fast and stable but needs better intelligence feeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Improved our security posture by making password changes easy and allowing us to make regular password changes to service accounts". DNIF is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), ELK Logstash and LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM, Thycotic Secret Server and BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.