Compare DNIF vs. One Identity Safeguard
DNIF is ranked 13th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 3rd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 14 reviews. DNIF is rated 7.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of DNIF writes "Powerful analytics and machine-learning enable us to find attack patterns". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Improved our security posture by making password changes easy and allowing us to make regular password changes to service accounts". DNIF is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar and ArcSight, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM.
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2020. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable. The response time on queries is super-fast. The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network. | We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required. It's one of the best products we've seen. When you start looking at the functionality and use cases and usability of the product, it's straightforward. They designed this product with the end-user in mind, and they also had the sysadmin who is supporting the product in mind. They really did a nice job. Overall, it's a nice product to work with. We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff. We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless. It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset. All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI. The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording. The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy. |
Cons | |
The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time. The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful. | The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region. From a usability perspective, what we are finding out is that our privileged domain admin users, in particular, want functionality for extending a checkout session. So we are working with One Identity support to see if there's an enhancement that can be made to the product. Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this. The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0. Transparent mode was too cumbersome, so I don't foresee us being able to use it. On paper when we were initially talking about it, it was definitely going to be the preferred method until we realized the burden it would be on our network guys. Then, we had to step back and reevaluate what we wanted to do. That's when we changed our approach to use the RD Gateway feature. Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service. I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated. Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
The pricing is based on the log size. | We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation. It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated. Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis. It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody. The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible. Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,679 Comparisons 1,113 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 990 Avg. Rating 7.0 | Views 2,935 Comparisons 1,254 Reviews 14 Average Words per Review 936 Avg. Rating 8.4 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 36% of the time.  Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time. |  Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. |
Learn | |
| NETMONASTERY | One Identity |
Overview | |
DNIF offers solutions to the world’s most challenging cybersecurity problems. Recognized by Gartner and used by some of the well-known global companies like PwC, Vodafone and Tata, this next generation analytics platform combines Security and Big Data Analytics to provide real-time threat detection and analytics to the most critical data assets on the Internet. With over a decade of experience in threat detection systems, DNIF has one of the fastest query response times and bridges the gap between searching, processing, analyzing and visualizing data thereby enabling companies with better SOC (Security Operations Center) management. | One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics. |
Offer | |
Learn more about DNIF | Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard. |
Sample Customers | |
| Vodafone India, IDEA Cellular, RBL Bank, NCDEX, NSE | Cavium |
Top Industries | |
Comms Service Provider50% Software R&D Company26% Media Company6% Manufacturing Company6% | Financial Services Firm71% University14% Manufacturing Company14% Software R&D Company32% Financial Services Firm21% Comms Service Provider16% Construction Company6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also DNIF Reviews, One Identity Safeguard Reviews, and our list of Best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA Companies.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.