We performed a comparison between OpenText Documentum and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The most valuable feature is that the documents are kept secure."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"It is quite good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"The user interface can be improved."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
