We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and IBM Integration Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"IBM Integration Bus' most valuable features are its performance, fast and easy development, and easy support."
"From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources."
"Easy to understand documentation with a huge list of examples and tutorials."
"IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand."
"The solution is stable and can scale relatively easily."
"It allows us to avoid the need for consumers to understand multiple API protocols and security arrangements, and in some circumstances can reduce the impact of systems being unavailable."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"The product is usually very easy to deploy."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"Performance can be an issue sometimes. The tool occasionally crashes due to memory-related problems. We've reported these issues to IBM, and they are actively working on improving the tooling experience."
"We decided to move away from IBM Integration Bus for IT technical refreshments."
"This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface."
"I would like for them to make the training much easier."
"The cloud deployment of the IBM Integration Bus should be made easier."
"They need to come up with Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). It should also have a feature for integrating with those applications that are on the cloud."
"We used a third-party vendor, who help us install the solution and it was not easy."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 5 reviews while IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 63 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus, whereas IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and JBoss ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.