Compare IBM Integration Bus vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats.""From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources.""This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn.""The solution's features are all quite useful. We use all of them.""The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues.""It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code.""The biggest advantage of this solution is that it is very easy to learn, and very easy to build applications.""The most valuable feature is that it's robust and its time to market is very short."

More IBM Integration Bus Pros »

"It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.""We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern.""The solution has good integration.""Performance-wise, this solution is really good.""Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

Cons
"This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface.""This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved.""I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms.""The user interface could be improved in a future release.""IBM could improve its connectivity.""I would like for them to make the training much easier.""One drawback that I have found is that there are issues with using the Java connector.""In terms of improvement, the UI should be more user-friendly."

More IBM Integration Bus Cons »

"The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.""Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved.""The installation configuration is quite difficult.""The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.""Technical support is good but they could have a better response time."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Our licensing is based on a five-year contract, and as far as I know, there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fee.""The price of this product could be lower.""The solution requires a license and is very expensive here in India.""The pricing could be improved to make it more competitive.""The price of the license could be cheaper.""The maintenance and support of the product are very expensive."

More IBM Integration Bus Pricing and Cost Advice »

"IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.""The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives.""This product is more expensive than competing products.""I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The stability is mostly pretty good.
Top Answer: There are experiences we have on the application, such as latency issues. There are no inherent components for you to throttle and measure the velocity of transactions. For that, you have to get a… more »
Top Answer: Integration and mapping are easy, which is a major advantage.
Top Answer: If you want to connect to the database, it provides solutions in India, but you have to purchase it separately. They are not mature enough and we have difficulties using them. They are expensive and… more »
Ranking
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
14,409
Comparisons
9,300
Reviews
23
Average Words per Review
541
Rating
7.6
7th
out of 24 in ESB
Views
3,300
Comparisons
2,777
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
541
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM WebSphere ESB
WebSphere Message Broker
Learn More
Overview
IBM Integration Bus is an enterprise integration engine that offers a fast, simple way for systems and applications to communicate with each other. As a result, it can help you achieve business value, reduce IT complexity and save money.
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Integration Bus
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Sample Customers
Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise66%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise88%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Integration Bus is ranked 3rd in ESB with 25 reviews while IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 7th in ESB with 5 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 7.6, while IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "A GUI that greatly simplifies data transformation and application developmet, but it is difficult to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Easy to setup and deploy, with easy mapping, and it integrates well with MQ". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus, Red Hat Fuse, IBM DataPower Gateway and webMethods Integration Server, whereas IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB, IBM BPM, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. IBM WebSphere Message Broker report.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.