IBM Integration Bus Competitors and Alternatives

The top IBM Integration Bus competitors are
  • Mule ESB
  • Oracle Service Bus
  • IBM WebSphere DataPower
  • webMethods Integration Server
  • TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
  • Red Hat Fuse
  • IBM WebSphere Message Broker
  • WSO2 Carbon
Read reviews of IBM Integration Bus competitors and alternatives
Mule ESB Logo
MuleSoft
Integrat6de8
Real User
Integration Architect @ Information Management, Integration and Analytics - RXP Services Limited at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
May 17 2017

What is most valuable?

DataWeave: It allows for complex mappings using a simple DSL (Domain Specific Language).

How has it helped my organization?

Integration between systems can often take several days. However, with MuleSoft ESB, it can take as little as fifteen... more»

What needs improvement?

The CloudHub offering requires some time to mature. However, it is a good overall solution. Some further details: 1.... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is tailored to the customer. As such, I would recommend speaking with your account representative.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Previously, we used Apache Camel and Spring Integration. However, they require more technical involvement than MuleSoft... more»

What other advice do I have?

Focus on the business problem you want to solve, as the technical integration in MuleSoft is relatively simple.
SrSoftwaDev
Real User
Sr. Software Developer | Systems Integration Specialist | Project Manager | EDI Technical Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Aug 06 2018

What do you think of webMethods Integration Server?

Primary Use Case: We're using it for managing secure file transfers for the company. • Improvements to My Organization: We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces. • Valuable Features: Ease of use. • Room for Improvement: The newest version, which we are not on, has all the features that we are looking for, meaning managed files transfer adapter. • Stability Issues: It is stable. They are rather aggressive in their patches and upgrades. • Scalability Issues: It seems to be doing very well. • Customer Service and Technical Support: We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable. • Previous Solutions: We did not use another solution previously. • Initial Setup: The...
it_user452640
Consultant
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Mar 22 2017

What is most valuable?

* It’s a lightweight tool compared to Oracle BPEL * The design of the product.

How has it helped my organization?

Because it can handle JSON inputs, we can now use JSON.

What needs improvement?

The logging and error-handling framework can be improved. Usage of DVMs, MDS and other additional features that are... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I heard it’s available free with Oracle SOA Suite 11g, so don’t worry about additional licensing costs for this product.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Even though we had been using Oracle BPEL, we had to go with Oracle Service Bus because it is able to handle JSON... more»

What other advice do I have?

It is a very lightweight product and has great processing speeds.

Sign Up with Email