IBM Integration Bus Competitors and Alternatives

The top IBM Integration Bus competitors are

Mule ESB
Oracle Service Bus
IBM WebSphere DataPower
webMethods Integration Server
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Red Hat Fuse
IBM WebSphere Message Broker
WSO2 Carbon

Read reviews of IBM Integration Bus competitors and alternatives

MuleSoft

Integrat6de8

Integration Architect @ Information Management, Integration and Analytics - RXP Services Limited at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 17 2017

What is most valuable?

DataWeave: It allows for complex mappings using a simple DSL (Domain Specific Language).

How has it helped my organization?

Integration between systems can often take several days. However, with MuleSoft ESB, it can take as little as fifteen... more»

What needs improvement?

The CloudHub offering requires some time to mature. However, it is a good overall solution. Some further details: 1.... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is tailored to the customer. As such, I would recommend speaking with your account representative.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Previously, we used Apache Camel and Spring Integration. However, they require more technical involvement than MuleSoft... more»

What other advice do I have?

Focus on the business problem you want to solve, as the technical integration in MuleSoft is relatively simple.

See Entire Mule ESB Review (296 Words) »

webMethods Integration Server

Software AG

SrSoftwaDev

Sr. Software Developer | Systems Integration Specialist | Project Manager | EDI Technical Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Aug 06 2018

What do you think of webMethods Integration Server?

Primary Use Case: We're using it for managing secure file transfers for the company. • Improvements to My Organization: We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces. • Valuable Features: Ease of use. • Room for Improvement: The newest version, which we are not on, has all the features that we are looking for, meaning managed files transfer adapter. • Stability Issues: It is stable. They are rather aggressive in their patches and upgrades. • Scalability Issues: It seems to be doing very well. • Customer Service and Technical Support: We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable. • Previous Solutions: We did not use another solution previously. • Initial Setup: The...

See Entire webMethods Integration Server Review (200 Words) »