Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs SonicWall CFS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Forcepoint Logo
565 views|350 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
SonicWall Logo
495 views|71 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and SonicWall CFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Filtering Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Shipra Gupta
Darshil Sanghvi
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The antiviral sandboxing.""I have found the simplicity of the solution valuable. The dashboard and reports are good as well.""The initial setup is not complex.""It's stable and reliable.""It’s pretty stable after you get up and running.""Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has improved our organization through its ease of use.""Provides good visibility and good filtering features.""The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Web Security is creating the easy to install further policies that are deployed through the Forcepoint security manual at some stage. Just drag and drop and the policies are there."

More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pros →

"It is very stable."

More SonicWall CFS Pros →

Cons
"The reporting could be improved.""We are using a V10000 G3 appliance. It is just a proxy. It is just HTTP, FTP, and HTTPS. Now, as our website has developed and we are using rich time-connectivity protocols, the proxy doesn't have the ability to work with these protocols. It would be nice if the UDP feature was there for it to filter UDP traffic. It needs firewall capabilities for UDP filtering. Its upgrades can be quite complex, and they don't always go as per the plan. Its reporting could be a bit more granular.""What's missing in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is a specific level of micro-control on protocols or devices, for example, where you can control a particular user or user device.""The availability of clusters is limited, and the product is very unstable. The development team is slow as well.""In the on-premises version, I don't like the deployment and structuring of the device.""Overall the software is occupying too much memory space. If they could remedy that, it would be a better experience, because today Windows is occupying too much memory space as well (in terms of the RAM), and this software has also started occupying all the memory. Due to this, I have less space for my other office products and data. I can't, for example, operate a huge Excel sheet or other datasets.""A feature we wish to see addressed in the next release of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway involves its administration.""To access the root of the product for troubleshooting you must have a data engineer. This is the big issue with Forcepoint. The support community is not good."

More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Cons →

"Malware, scanning, capture, and integration should be included with the content filtering."

More SonicWall CFS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Expensive, but with a good reseller you can get a very good price."
  • "It is a well-priced option."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition."
  • "The licensing is not expensive."
  • "The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Licensing is flexible. License pricing information is based on the customer, their environment, and on the future approach."
  • "The solution is priced a little high compare to similar solutions."
  • More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is very reasonable."
  • More SonicWall CFS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Filtering solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's user management is an area where my company does not face any challenges.
    Top Answer:Compared to the other products in the market, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway can be a cost-effective tool. My company does not want to look at a tool that offers fewer capabilities at a low cost… more »
    Top Answer:If there is a category of generative AI or GenAI, it is not a very detailed category, as there are many AI-based sites where data exfiltration can happen. In the category of generative AI or GenAI… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    565
    Comparisons
    350
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    481
    Rating
    7.5
    5th
    Views
    495
    Comparisons
    71
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
    SonicWall Content Filtering Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is a secure web gateway (SWG) tool that provides multiple forms of protection against malware, including blocking categories of websites, inline scanning of downloaded files, and zero trust-based advanced threat protection. The solution monitors and controls any interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal file sharing accounts, and detecting shadow IT.

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Features

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Real-time traffic inspection
    • Protection for off-grid workers
    • Time and content-based access
    • Data leak prevention
    • SCIM provisioning
    • Data-in-motion scanning
    • Connection policies
    • Content policies
    • RBI profiles
    • Discovery dashboard
    • Bypass prevention
    • Unified on-device agent
    • Field Programmable SASE Logic (FPSL)

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Fast: The solution is high speed with on-device enforcement. Traffic is routed directly to its destination. In addition, you will experience fewer bottlenecks and choke points.
    • Flexible: Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is designed to automatically scale up or down with traffic needs. It is also flexible because it is hosted on AWS in more than 300 data centers.
    • Advanced DLP capabilities: The solution’s advanced DLP capabilities keep sensitive information from leaking out onto websites to provide consistent protection and simplify management.
    • Streamlined security: Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is part of Forcepoint ONE, a Security Service Edge (SSE) cloud-native platform that provides secure access to web, cloud, and private apps while connecting users directly to websites so you can skip the data center.
    • Unified administrator console: You can use the solution’s unified administrator console to reduce repetitive and redundant configuration management.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it has strong reporting capabilities, good URL filtering, and can retrieve and analyze lost data when necessary.

    Shipra G., Service Delivery Manager at Paramount Computer Systems, says, “The reporting part of it is pretty awesome. With the reporting, you can drill down effectively. It gives us a lot of power to really look into what we are looking for. That is one very crucial feature. In the remote filtering part, the agent that they have on Forcepoint is pretty light. That also is a very, very good feature that we look into and sell.”

    Mohammed S., Security Engineer at Futuretec, writes, "The most valuable feature for me in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is URL filtering, though all other features of the product are okay as well."

    Arvind K., Director at Foresight Software Solutions Pvt Ltd., says, “They have well-integrated web security. They have the enterprise DLP included in the cloud as well.”

    An Ict Help Desk Administrator Individual Contributor at a transportation company states, “The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is the ability to retrieve and analyze lost data. It also allows us to detect and prevent the release of all messages and to take appropriate actions in consequence.”

    Paylocity, Rochester School Department

    Sample Customers
    Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Integrator7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Filtering
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 2nd in Web Content Filtering with 47 reviews while SonicWall CFS is ranked 5th in Web Content Filtering. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 7.8, while SonicWall CFS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Simple to set up, reliable, and offers great reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall CFS writes "Reliable content filtering but need more traffic control". Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Symantec Proxy, Fortinet FortiProxy and Fortinet FortiGate SWG, whereas SonicWall CFS is most compared with Barracuda Web Security and Filtering.

    See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.