Compare Forcepoint Web Security vs. M86 Web Content Filtering

Forcepoint Web Security is ranked 1st in Web Content Filtering with 4 reviews while M86 Web Content Filtering is ranked 6th in Web Content Filtering. Forcepoint Web Security is rated 8.0, while M86 Web Content Filtering is rated 0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Web Security writes "Unifies Network Resources with Multi-Link Support". On the other hand, Forcepoint Web Security is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access and Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security, whereas M86 Web Content Filtering is most compared with Barracuda Web Security Gateway.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use M86 Web Content Filtering? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Filtering solutions are best for your needs.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
8,427
Comparisons
4,110
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
273
Avg. Rating
8.0
6th
Views
149
Comparisons
49
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
Learn
Forcepoint
M86 Security
Video Not Available
Overview
Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access. Trustwave Web Filtering is a granular policy-based solution that monitors and blocks access to offensive or potentially harmful sites. ITrustwave Web Filtering monitors web requests and matches those against a database of inappropriate categories or URL keywords, which provides depth and control over policies. Organizations can add more than 100 custom categories. Administrators can create policies based on individuals, groups, containers or workstations and provides management with tools to enforce an organization's acceptable-use policies and limits legal liabilities resulting from exposure to inappropriate or offensive web content. Trustwave Web Filtering includes a mobile security client and the product permits real-time and forensic reporting via a centrally managed tool
Offer
Learn more about Forcepoint Web Security
Learn more about M86 Web Content Filtering
Sample Customers
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, ToyotaCrest Savings Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Integrator13%
Insurance Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Web Security vs. McAfee Web Protection and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email