Galen Framework vs. SmartBear TestComplete

As of March 2019, Galen Framework is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools vs SmartBear TestComplete which is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". Galen Framework is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio and BrowserStack. SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Galen Framework? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2019.
325,926 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
325,926 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
1,532
Comparisons
798
Reviews
1
Followers
204
Avg. Rating
9.0
4th
Views
34,792
Comparisons
12,573
Reviews
15
Followers
1,088
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Learn
Galen Framework
Video Not Available
SmartBear
Overview

Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.

Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.

Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Galen Framework
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company13%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company19%
Financial Services Firm19%
Retailer8%
Transportation Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2019.
325,926 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email