IBM Case Foundation vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
499 views|401 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
iGrafx Logo
1,017 views|602 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Case Foundation and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Case Foundation vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.""It's very easy.""It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events.""The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features.""The solution is scalable.""Case Foundation provides a strong security boost.""Flexible and the ability to divide search screens, and to search for documents. The ECM feature inside the system is great.""The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."

More IBM Case Foundation Pros →

"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it.""Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use.""Simulation is most valuable.""The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.""We found the technical support to be helpful.""Provides a valuable BPMN feature.""The solution is very stable.""Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pros →

Cons
"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM.""There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings.""The interface needs to be more user-friendly.""90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly.""We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic.""Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly.""The cloud version could use more stability.""The solution can be quite expensive."

More IBM Case Foundation Cons →

"It can be more user-friendly.""The price could be more competitive.""It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us.""It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server.""Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process.""In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet.""I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping.""The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."
  • "This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."
  • "IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."
  • "The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."
  • More IBM Case Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."
  • "Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."
  • "The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."
  • More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.
    Top Answer:The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either. I would rate it five out of ten.
    Top Answer:There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.
    Top Answer:I’m not sure of the exact pricing. However, I would describe their costs as mid-tier.
    Top Answer:The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings. The web modeling part can be a bit complex or difficult for new users of the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    499
    Comparisons
    401
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    536
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    1,017
    Comparisons
    602
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    478
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

    The iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is a comprehensive software platform tailored for organizations undergoing digital transformation. Its core functionalities include process mining, process design, simulation, predictive analytics, and AI-based automation. By leveraging these tools, businesses can gain valuable insights into their processes, streamline design and optimization efforts, and harness automation for enhanced efficiency. Whether analyzing existing processes, visually modeling workflows, simulating potential changes, or employing predictive analytics, Process360 Live facilitates a seamless journey towards process intelligence and management, pivotal for modern businesses aiming for operational excellence.

    Sample Customers
    Suncorp Group Limited
    Multinational Bank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government15%
    Insurance Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Consumer Goods Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Engineering Company10%
    Pharma/Biotech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Case Foundation vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Case Foundation vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Case Foundation is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 15 reviews. IBM Case Foundation is rated 7.8, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Case Foundation writes "Streamlined business process automation with user-friendly design". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". IBM Case Foundation is most compared with IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our IBM Case Foundation vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.