IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service vs. Microsoft Azure

IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service is ranked 60th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vs Microsoft Azure which is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 24 reviews. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Puts the "scaffolding" in place and allows you to focus on the business solution". IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service is most compared with . Microsoft Azure is most compared with Heroku, Oracle Cloud Platform and SAP Cloud Platform.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, Stratoscale and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS).
291,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service vs. Microsoft Azure

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The pricing is very competitive.The cost-benefit equation for Azure is very good, particularly for small applications. However, Microsoft should do much, much more to improve how costs are communicated and how to forecast them. The Azure Pricing Calculator is not useful.Pricing is very difficult to guesstimate. With so many a la carte options and individual pricing it can be a hassle to understand.If you are not aware of costs, pricing, etc., you can end up with a hefty bill. However, I found that the Azure price calculator is a valuable tool to use before starting to deploy VMs in Azure. This tool will give you an overview of the costs you should expect on a monthly, quarterly or yearly basis.Several thousand dollars and counting, we haven't needed to upgrade on premises hardware (In fact we eliminated all of the old on-premises hardware and run 100% on Azure) or pay for it's maintenance, power etc.Keep to PaaS to gain the optimal benefits from an OPEX finance and resource perspective.It’s necessary to use third party products or to use good self-management economic toolsBe careful with Azure Cool storage accounts; if you are dealing with high object counts, then it can be more economical to use Hot storage because of the high storage access costs associated with Cool.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
291,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
20
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Followers
32
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
42,050
Comparisons
26,980
Reviews
24
Followers
999
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service competitors »
Compared 23% of the time.
See more Microsoft Azure competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsIBM Cloud IaaSWindows Azure, Azure
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
Microsoft
Overview
Overview
Information Not Available

Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.

Windows Azure offers open across multiple frameworks,languages, and tools. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities are, catering for all elements of application development, deployment, and management.

Azure is comprised of several different service modules,including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.

OFFER
Learn more about IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service
Learn more about Microsoft Azure
Sample Customers
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Retailer
14%
Software R&D Company
14%
Insurance Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Transportation Company
7%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
56%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
28%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, Stratoscale and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS).
Download now
291,567 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email