IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service Competitors and Alternatives

Competitor
# Comparisons
Rating
Get our free report covering , and other competitors of IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service competitors and alternatives

reviewer1453872
Information Technology Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Nov 14, 2020
Easy to add on services, relatively stable, and very scalable

What is our primary use case?

This solution is used to migrate data to the cloud. They have a few different ways that this can happen. You can use the public cloud or private cloud, for example. Or you can use a hybrid as well. If you want to add some services, they have that capability to do that. Even if you want to improve your network, and you want to add your storage, or you want to maybe improve the speed of your infrastructure, they have that capability.

Pros and Cons

  • "Microsoft offers free courses and an exam on their products. Many of my colleagues who use Microsoft Azure take advantage of those free courses to help them learn about the solution in depth."
  • "It would be nice if there was an on-premises version of the solution, and it wasn't just cloud-based."

What other advice do I have?

I'm a consultant. I work as a partner with Microsoft. We're using the latest version of the solution at this time. I would recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it nine out of ten overall.
SaleemKhokhar
Director at Peritus
Real User
Top 5
Dec 4, 2019
The interface and the new user experience are really helpful for the end-user

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution as an end-to-end integration. Most companies are already using financial software, but they want to have software which can offer complete integration. In our case, it's finance, material management, sales distribution, and HR.

Pros and Cons

  • "There are two main features that we find very valuable. One is the interface and the new user experience. That's really, really helpful for the end-user. The second is the HANA database itself because it speeds up the process. In other solutions, like Oracle, there is a lot of redundancy that slows things down."
  • "The solution needs a warehouse management feature. Right now, there's a built-in WM, but they don't have an EWM extended warehouse management built-in, in S/4HANA. It's a separate product. So if they can add that, that would be great."

What other advice do I have?

We use both the on-premises and private cloud deployment models. I'd rate the solution 7.5 out of ten.
Get our free report covering , and other competitors of IBM Cloud Infrastructure as a Service. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.