We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."
"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."
"The pricing can be improved."
"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is ranked 14th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration writes "A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is most compared with IBM App Connect, IBM API Connect, IBM DataPower Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.