We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The mapping transformation allows us to connect our on-premise ECC to the cloud system."
"SAP is an excellent company with an excellent reputation, excellent products, and dedicated customer support."
"The solution is scalable."
"The integration flows are the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The most valuable features of SAP Cloud Platform are security integration and scalability."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"One of the best features of this solution is that it is web-based and you can log in and work on it from anywhere."
"It's suitable for various sizes of companies. I have used it with big companies and with small ones as well."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"It should give better control over account management."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
"The main problem is that there aren't any easy migrations from SAP PO to SAP CPI, so from process orchestration to cloud platform integration."
"One crucial aspect where SAP lags behind in flexibility is customization to suit specific business requirements. SAP needs to understand that customization is inevitable and should be more supportive of business-driven customization."
"I can’t speak to features that may be missing."
"I've observed a few bugs in SAP. One recent bug I found in Content Modifier is that when using a predefined header to call the current date, it prints the previous date. These are small bugs I found."
"Speaking about the public cloud, it's a very rigid system. So, there is not a lot of customization possible in a public cloud environment."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, webMethods.io Integration and Salesforce Platform. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
