We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: When choosing a Business-to-Business Middleware tool Mule Anypoint Platform slightly nudges ahead of SAP Process Orchestration. PeerSpot users feel Mule Anypoint Platform can help organizations simplify the development of products and increase productivity. The solution provides a valuable API toolkit and intuitive monitoring capabilities. Many users feel SAP Process Orchestration should be more scalable and user friendly.
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"The solution is easy to use."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The price could be improved."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."
"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 40 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM B2B Integrator and TIBCO BusinessWorks. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
