Compare IBM ECM vs. IBM FileNet
Use IBM ECM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"1. It will be more expensive than estimated to setup. 2. You will need to double the staff while you are running the old system and installing the new system. 3. Depending on the number of documents to be migrated, make sure you understand the potentially massive amount of time and effort required to migrate the existing content to the new platform."
"The physical space that we have gained back pays for the service. Therefore, it has reduced our operating costs overall. We have definitely seen ROI. I would estimate $30,000 a year."
"Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not."
"My customers have seen ROI. There have been productivity gains, time savings gains, and things that they have been doing much more efficiently in a more modern way than they were before."
"It has reduced operating costs by reducing the amount of manual work needed."
"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."
"The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do."
"Yearly, we pay for the maintenance, which is $20,000."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
2,571
Comparisons
2,019
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
12,332
Comparisons
6,064
Reviews
31
Average Words per Review
773
Rating
8.3
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
IBM Content Foundation on Cloud
IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.
IBM Case Manager on Cloud
IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.
IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.
There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.
Learn more about IBM ECM
Learn more about IBM FileNet
KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group
Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.
Financial Services Firm53%
Insurance Company20%
Healthcare Company7%
Local Government7%
Computer Software Company36%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm33%
Insurance Company17%
Healthcare Company11%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company8%
Large Enterprise100%
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM ECM is ranked 13th in Enterprise Content Management while IBM FileNet is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 31 reviews. IBM ECM is rated 0.0, while IBM FileNet is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "Easy to integrate, and enables our clients to guarantee compliance". IBM ECM is most compared with ASG Mobius, SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Content Suite Platform, whereas IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum, Alfresco and Hyland OnBase.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.