• Home
  • IBM ECM vs. SunGard EXP Macess [EOL]

IBM ECM vs SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM ECM

Read 16 IBM ECM reviews
880 views|761 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
FIS Logo

SunGard EXP Macess [EOL]

views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM ECM and SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Omar_Ismail
A stable solution for automation with high availability
Most bigger projects with over 50 million documents use IBM ECM. We have more than 16 such projects in Saudi Arabia.
Use SunGard EXP Macess [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Reach out to local IBM partners.​"

    • More IBM ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM ECM?
    Top Answer:The tool is a very stable solution with high availability and no information leakage. It has built-in API integration on-site. You can integrate with other components and applications like SAP… more »
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM ECM?
    Top Answer:The product is expensive and has a perpetual license.
    What needs improvement with IBM ECM?
    Top Answer:The development platform is not local. For example, you need 100 days in IBM, whereas other platforms, like ServiceNow, need only 20 days.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    13th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    880
    Comparisons
    761
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    348
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Enterprise Content Management
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EXP Macess
    Learn More
    IBM
    FIS
    Overview

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud

    IBM Content Foundation on Cloud allows organizations to deliver extensive enterprise content management capabilities to their users very quickly. IBM Content Foundation is powered by the FileNet content and process platform and IBM Content Navigator user experience. This cloud offering can be leveraged for a variety of use cases including collaborative document management, imaging solutions, social content management, archiving, and more. It also offers a platform for developing Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions in the cloud.


     IBM Case Manager on Cloud

    IBM Case Manager on Cloud is a solution platform that engages people with business content, provides contextual insight through real-time analytics, and enhances teamwork through collaboration tools and flexible workflow. Enables Business and IT to work together to create solutions across the enterprise that enables an organization to make smarter decisions for better business outcomes, while balancing the need for security and compliance in a world of heightened risk.

                                   

    Macess is an enterprise solution combining content management, business process management (BPM), customer relationship management (CRM) and leading-edge integration resources into a single application suite used across the organization.

    Sample Customers
    KeyBank, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank, Sistema Tecnol‹gico de Monterrey, Illinois Department of Human Services, UnitedHealth Group
    Ullico Inc., West Bend Mutual Insurance, Dakotacare, Tufts Health Plan, Liberty Life, Baloise Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm53%
    Insurance Company20%
    Religious Institution7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business6%
    Large Enterprise94%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM ECM is ranked 13th in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews while SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Content Management. IBM ECM is rated 8.0, while SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM ECM writes "Datacap provides granularity and any level of customization. Solution development and delivery time needs to be improved". On the other hand, IBM ECM is most compared with IBM FileNet, Mobius Content Services Platform, OpenText Documentum, SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management and Alfresco, whereas SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] is most compared with Laserfiche Rio.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.