IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest

IBM Rational Quality Manager is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews vs PractiTest which is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Quality Manager writes "Global Configuration allows the user to maintain different versions of the same artifact. It does not provide inbuilt capabilities for managing the tasks related to testing". The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "The reporting helps with sprint planning, review, and retro sessions". IBM Rational Quality Manager is most compared with Quality Center, SmartBear TestComplete and Visual Studio Test Professional. PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise and qTest. See our IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Ibm rational quality manager vs. practitest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest and others in Test Management Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Ibm rational quality manager vs. practitest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest and others in Test Management Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
2,477
Comparisons
1,761
Reviews
4
Followers
523
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
871
Comparisons
542
Reviews
6
Followers
121
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more IBM Rational Quality Manager competitors »
Gurock logo
Compared 22% of the time.
Zephyr%20enterprise logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Qasymphony logo
Compared 14% of the time.
See more PractiTest competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsRational Quality Manager
Website/Video
Website/VideoIBM
  • Vendor 7400 screenshot 1524637054
PractiTest
  • Vendor 30126 screenshot 1527354779
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewIBM Rational Quality Manager is a collaborative hub for business-driven software and systems quality across virtually any platform and type of testing. This software helps teams share information seamlessly, use automation to accelerate project schedules and report on metrics for informed release decisions. Rational Quality Manager helps quality assurance teams collaborate by sharing project information and status updates seamlessly so team members can synchronize teamwork throughout the lifecycle. It helps them automate by reducing labor-intensive activities to accelerate project schedules. In addition, it helps them govern by understanding and reporting on project metrics enabling accurate, reliable and timely release decisions.

Manage your QA and Testing process, controlling your testing tasks while getting complete visibility into your results, and most importantly releasing your products in a professional way

Professional end to end QA management for your manual and automation testing. 
  • Create your manual tests and organize them based on cycles, sprints, etc.
  • Seamlessly integrate your manual testing with your automation and CI processes.
  • Reuse tests and correlate results across different releases and products.
  • Release your products with confidence and control.


OFFER
Learn more about IBM Rational Quality Manager
Learn more about PractiTest
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersEhrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, BarrCanonical, SAS, Amobee, Play Buzz, Abbott, Aternity, Zerto, Freeman
Ibm rational quality manager vs. practitest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Quality Manager vs PractiTest and others in Test Management Tools.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email