We performed a comparison between M-Files and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software."Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The integration with other products needs to be improved."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Earn 20 points
M-Files is ranked 8th in Document Management Software while Oracle Content Management is ranked 7th in Document Management Software with 2 reviews. M-Files is rated 9.0, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, OpenText Documentum and Microsoft Purview Records Management, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
