We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Process Monitoring and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The stability has been very good over the years."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"It's easy to use."
"It is very good at monitoring Microsoft Server."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"It takes a lot of the headache out of managing your data centers and software in other places."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."
"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
"It would be a much better product if Microsoft provided management packs with the product."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."
"The solution should have more tools for monitoring the cloud engine versus on-premise."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 77 reviews. OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics and Dynatrace, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.