Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.6, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Works perfectly with the CUTE application and great for Windows OS, but not other operating systems". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Micro Focus UFT Developer, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and Katalon Studio. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
UFT has improved our ability to regression test.

Read more »

Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.

Read more »

Cons
It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.

Read more »

The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
25,414
Comparisons
15,957
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
973
Avg. Rating
8.5
3rd
Views
19,855
Comparisons
13,084
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
SmartBear
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company22%
Financial Services Firm11%
Retailer11%
Comms Service Provider11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.