Compare Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

"The most valuable features are the desktop and mobile modules.""The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup.""The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.""Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.""The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.""The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.""The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros »

Cons
"Technical support could be improved.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

"The licensing costs are a little bit high and should be reduced.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.""Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.""The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.""The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.""The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.""The artificial intelligence needs to be improved."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is quite costly and there is no free trial available."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If you are looking for advanced use cases for integrating JIRA with other systems, I suggest you look at products like https://zigiwave.com/ Their platform is rich, flexible, and support common use… more »
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Top Answer: UFT has improved our ability to regression test.
Top Answer: Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.
Top Answer: I'm not sure if there are licensing costs involved in the solution. We simply bought the product outright and started using it.
Top Answer: The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS. Right now, Complete can test only on native… more »
Ranking
3rd
Views
24,236
Comparisons
15,640
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
830
Avg. Rating
8.5
4th
Views
19,291
Comparisons
12,863
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
SmartBear
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Healthcare Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider8%
Media Company6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise96%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 7 reviews while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Micro Focus UFT One is rated 8.2, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, Ranorex Studio and Worksoft Certify, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Eggplant Functional and Appium. See our Micro Focus UFT One vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.