We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level."
"Microsoft Project Server is simple to use."
"One notable positive aspect is its effective project-tracking capabilities."
"It is well-established, reliable, and compatible."
"The most useful feature of Microsoft Project Server is you can select a function to see the baseline."
"In the competitive landscape of project management and portfolio management solutions, Microsoft Project Server stands out significantly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."
"We are able to know what we are doing, how much we have spent, how much time we've taken, and it tells us how much money is left for the project. It also tells us whether we are below or above our expenditures, whether we are below or above our budget."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"We think that calculations are not working correctly, and there is a need to enter data a couple of times in order to give the correct calculations."
"It may be considered expensive."
"We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly."
"Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."
"The user interface looks quite old and needs to be improved."
"The solution needs to be much more stable."
"This is a good product but we have struggled with stability from time to time. The service has stopped intermittently and it has been difficult to find a reason why."
"The solution's synchronization with Jira Projects should be improved."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
