We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAS Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The stability could be better."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAS Access is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAS Access report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.