We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAS Access

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: September 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration.""This is the easiest and best tool available.""API management.""It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes.""The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization.""Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable.""Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs.""Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Pros »

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

More SAS Access Pros »

Cons
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services.""Mule should have better B2B integration.""Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings.""It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur.""The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet.""Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required.""Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful.""Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Cons »

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

More SAS Access Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Mule is not the cheapest integration platform out there, but it deserves the price we are paying.""The product comes complete at one set price including support."

More Mule Anypoint Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

More SAS Access Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money… more »
Top Answer: We are very satisfied with the DevOps support.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
20,528
Comparisons
15,059
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
557
Rating
7.8
21st
Views
567
Comparisons
455
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
2,916
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Integrator
SAS/Access
Learn More
Overview

With connectivity, composability, and control, Anypoint Platform solves the most challenging connectivity problems across SOA, SaaS, and APIs. It's a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.
Offer
Learn more about Mule Anypoint Platform
Learn more about SAS Access
Sample Customers
VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren
Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise47%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise62%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: September 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 12 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 21st in Data Integration Tools with 1 review. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 7.8, while SAS Access is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Constantly improving to help connect applications, data, and devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "Connect databases and create access to simplify complex processes with this powerful tool". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with TIBCO BusinessWorks, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Mule ESB and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas SAS Access is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Toad Data Point, IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SSIS and Denodo.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.