We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Tibco BusinessWorks based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Tibco BusinessWorks is the winner in this comparison. It is a scalable, high performing, and reliable solution. In addition, it is easier to deploy than Mule Anypoint Platform.
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"It is a very robust system."
"Good TIBCO BusinessWorks features are the admin console and the ability to roll back to the previous version."
"The solution is stable. We haven't had any serious technical issues."
"BusinessWorks reduces development time, helping developers to focus on business logic."
"The most valuable features are the stability and the time to market."
"The most valuable feature is the low-code platform."
"We use the solution to develop applications."
"The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."
"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."
"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."
"The cost of this product is too expensive for smaller companies or those with a small number of integrations."
"The technical support's turnaround time is an area where TIBCO needs to consider improvements...Getting support from TIBCO on a particular issue takes a lot of turnaround time."
"I'd like to see a new cloud approach in the next release. They need to work on integrations, stability and management issues on their cloud platform."
"They don't support out of the box - you have to buy adapters or you have to have the technology."
"Technical support is average. It's not the best."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Talend Open Studio, Confluent and Informatica PowerCenter. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.