We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"The setup is easy."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
