We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."
"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."
"It's way of handling is really an advantage. It's quite easy to use, without too much training . That's the main point for me."
"The most valuable feature for me is usability."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"It's very user-orientated, which is why I gave it a high rating, even if it is not perfect in every corner."
"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."
"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."
"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."
"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
