Compare Nintex Workflow vs. Signavio Process Manager
Sponsored
 | AlonBear Co Founder at Dr. Agile |
 | Ram Chenna Enterprise Architect and CTO at Blueray Consulting |
 | PaulHoward Managing Director at Aqetas |
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Workflow vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"It has an open BPM"
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"The most valuable feature for me is usability."
"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."
"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."
"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."
Cons
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"There could be something more on the reporting side of it for the processes you have captured or processes that might be work in progress to see where to target your effort because you don't always have lots of resources to spare"
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda is much cheaper."
"I use the open-source free version."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."
"Comparatively, it's expensive."
"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."
"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."
"I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."
"SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."
"This solution provides really great value for the money."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
Top Answer: There is an open-source version available, that in its core features (workflow and decision engine, modeler) is exactly… more »
Top Answer: In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process… more »
Top Answer: The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients… more »
Top Answer: The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions… more »
Top Answer: In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can… more »
Top Answer: SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees.
Top Answer: More Machine Learning and data algorithms for predictions could be involved in order to get a better understanding of… more »
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Camunda BPM
Nintex Workflow Platform
Signavio Process Editor
Camunda Platform is a complete process automation tech stack with powerful execution engines for BPMN workflows and DMN decisions paired with essential applications for modeling, operations, and analytics.
With a clear vision to automate any process, anywhere, Camunda is reinventing process automation for the digital enterprise. Featuring a developer-friendly, open source approach, enterprises can use Camunda Platform to breakthrough technological, organizational, and infrastructure barriers, optimize their business processes, and drive their digital transformation initiatives forward.
At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.
The Signavio Process Manager is an intuitive BPM solution for professional process modeling. Whether you want to create current-state documentation or target concepts, the Signavio Process Manager is your best choice for process modeling. Thanks to innovative web technology, you can get started right away and include your colleagues in collaborative design.
Learn more about Camunda Platform
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Learn more about Signavio Process Manager
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, Allianz Indonesia, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Asiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
DHL, Transurban, Prudential Life Assurance, Zalando, T-Systems, Audi BKK, 1&1, Bugatti
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider18%
Non Profit12%
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm12%
Government7%
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Financial Services Firm14%
Retailer11%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Media Company11%
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise26%
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise56%
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise60%
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise69%
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Workflow vs. Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Nintex Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management with 4 reviews while Signavio Process Manager is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management with 36 reviews. Nintex Workflow is rated 8.6, while Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Good support, straightforward to set up, and improves our process performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Signavio Process Manager writes "Enables us to identify business analysts that are working on two different things and link up efforts". Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2, Pega BPM, AgilePoint, Bizagi and ARIS BPA, whereas Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Visio, Bizagi and ARIS Cloud. See our Nintex Workflow vs. Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.