We performed a comparison between One Identity Safeguard and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording."
"The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution."
"It is generally easy-to-use and install."
"The customer service and technical support are very good."
"The technical support is tremendous."
"It offers high availability and enables end users to deploy the solution with 99.999 percent uptime, which is crucial in an enterprise environment with a large number of endpoints."
"We are able to log and get reporting on all privileged activity that is being performed. We like the fact that we can leverage the session recording feature, which is especially valuable when we're dealing with third-party vendors that have to remote into our our boxes and servers to do any work on behalf of the bank. Now, we can record everything they are doing to ensure that they're only doing the changes that were needed. In addition, we use it to leverage knowledge transfer with our internal staff."
"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."
"The Transparent Mode could be somewhat easier to use."
"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk."
"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."
"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."
"Cost-wise, it is a little bit expensive, which makes it difficult to get management approval. Its price should be reduced."
"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."
"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."
"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."
One Identity Safeguard is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews while senhasegura Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2, while senhasegura Access Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". On the other hand, the top reviewer of senhasegura Access Management writes "With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users". One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM, whereas senhasegura Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine PAM360.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
