We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The interface is easy to use."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The product must provide more integration."
"The data flow can be improved."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The performance could be faster."
"The documentation is limited."
"Its UI could be better."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 5th in Test Management Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
