Oracle Database vs SAP IQ

Oracle Database is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 48 reviews vs SAP IQ which is ranked 6th in Relational Databases with 6 reviews. The top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "It provides reliability, in terms of handling large volumes of data". The top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "A column-based solution with the highest performance on query". Oracle Database is most compared with IBM DB2, SQL Server and Tibero. SAP IQ is most compared with SQL Server, SAP ASE and Oracle Database. See our Oracle Database vs SAP IQ report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database vs SAP IQ and others in Relational Databases.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Oracle Database vs SAP IQ

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Using the product, we make less mistakes, are more organized and faster than if we did it any another way.Compared to other databases, Oracle Database is very simple to manage in terms of the database itself.It stores a lot of data in a short time.It is flexible, scalable, and a true Enterprise RDBMS.High availability using real application clusters.It gives DB consistency, supports disaster recovery (DR), is tunable, and handles large DB sizes.You can install Oracle Database software, patching, and create/configure Oracle databases in silent using scriptsPerformance is the best key value. Oracle provides Exadata, the engineered system designed for Oracle Database, where you can achieve maximum performance.

Read more »

The column-based technologies (basically all the database for ITP) are used for SAP IQ. It is used as a column-based solution.It is very robust for ad hoc DW queries and its columnar compression is unique and valuable.Valuable features for us include the compression, speed, fast response time, and easy object maintenance.Columnar storage allows high compression, high load rates and high query performance.

Read more »

Cons
There are a lot of bugs in the Oracle Database, and it would be better if the bugs would be solved more quickly than they are today.In general, the support is not good since most of the time the person whom you are given to is not so professional.Integration with big data would be helpful since we are planning to load a lot of big data.A lot of features have bugs or choose the wrong way to process data.Auditing could be improved, especially granular auditing. The unified audit trail in 12c is great, however its extraction in a highly busy environment is quite a challenge.The compression does not give much value-add or provide performance benefits as was highlighted.Cloud installations using Oracle are not supported by SAP.​​​Upgrade is the most critical phase for the lifecycle of a database. In order to be sure that the migration succeeds, you need to be up-to-date. Therefore, regularly install the patchset and security updates.

Read more »

The room for improvement would be the marketing of the product, because this product is much better than advertised.Multiplex is very problematic. There are consistency problems in the metadata, meaning it is possible to lose metadata consistency. You should make sure you have healthy backups.I think the universe should be part of the Sybase IQ tool set.Concurrency and functional error messaging.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very expensive for the support.The main issue where I feel that Oracle still has a problem is with the licensing. Licensing is still expensive and the reason why today most startups use other, cheaper databases. Those other databases are much less sophisticated than Oracle.​The license cost need to be optimized. The licensing cost is very high compared to other RDBMS.Be prepared to pay for consulting services, and do not underestimate the time required to find and hire good quality database administrators.

Read more »

Negotiation is very important.Negotiate based on the features required.Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
30,924
Comparisons
8,445
Reviews
48
Followers
699
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
9,884
Comparisons
6,243
Reviews
6
Followers
514
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
See more Oracle Database competitors »
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
See more SAP IQ competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsOracle 12c, RDBMSSybase IQ
Website/Video
Website/VideoOracle
SAP
Overview
Overview

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Transform your business and enhance in-the-moment decision making with SAP IQ (formerly Sybase IQ). This columnar relational database management system (RDBMS) is highly optimized for Big Data analytics. Leverage SAP IQ's extreme scalability and robust security features for enterprise data warehouse (EDW) use cases - and get unprecedented insights in a data-intensive world.

OFFER
Learn more about Oracle Database
Learn more about SAP IQ
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.AASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Media Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
75%
Marketing Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
43%
Energy/Utilities Company
19%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
66%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database vs SAP IQ and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email