Compare Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors.""The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value.""The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us""The most valuable feature is the ease of customization.""The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial""It has a number of pre-built connectors. Its flow designer is also valuable. It provides the ease of promotion between environments and the ease of connection management. It is also stable and easy to scale and deploy.""OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces.""In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pros »

"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.""The solution has a very comprehensive and versatile set of connectors. I've been able to utilize it for multiple, different mechanisms. We do a lot of SaaS and we do have IoT devices and the solution is comprehensive in those areas.""One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations.""Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today.""The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you.""The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release.""Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define.""They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners""Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced.""The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM.""It lacks configurable time-outs on connections. Configurable time-outs is an important nonfunctional property that it is currently missing. I have also written about it in an article, and I have also submitted some enhancement requests. Its visual designer could be a bit more responsive. It would also be good to get more XSLT editing capabilities.""Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good.""The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Cons »

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.""Technical support is an area where they can improve.""I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.""The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so.""The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG.""Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time.""It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking.""I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It has different licensing models. The most upfront and most transparent is the pay-as-you-go model. It also has a certain messages-per-hour limit. There is a certain amount that is charged per hour, and a certain number of messages are included in it, which you can scale up as you go. Its licensing is very competent and easy.""In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.""The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.""This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.""It's a good deal for the money that we pay.""Currently, the licensing solution for this product is pretty straightforward. The way that Software AG has moved in their licensing agreements is very understandable. It is very easy for you to see where things land. Like most vendors today, they are transaction based. Therefore, just having a good understanding of how many transactions that you are doing a year would be very wise. Luckily, there are opportunities to work with the vendor to get a good understanding of how many transactions you have and what is the right limit for you to fall under.""Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive.""I do think webMethods is coming under increasing pressure when it comes to their price-to-feature value proposition. It's probably the single biggest strategic risk they have. They're very expensive in their industry. They've been raising the price recently, especially when compared with their competitors."

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files.
Top Answer: Many open-source products can offer a high level of customizability and no upfront licensing cost. However, there can be a high cost involved in provisioning infrastructure, expertise, and other… more »
Top Answer: Improvements can be made in several areas, as follows: * Configurable timeouts on each connection would be better than a single global timeout that applies to all. The rationale for why timeouts are… more »
Top Answer: It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the… more »
Top Answer: I don't think webMethods is the cheapest but I think the quality is worth it. But it's not cheap. We're satisfied with our choice and the price is not a reason to look for something else.
Top Answer: In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather… more »
Ranking
Views
7,451
Comparisons
5,925
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
703
Rating
7.5
Views
16,706
Comparisons
11,615
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
1,460
Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle ICS
Learn More
Overview

Oracle Integration Cloud Service (ICS) delivers best in class “Hybrid” Integration. ICS is a simple and powerful integration platform in the cloud to maximize the value of your investments in SaaS and on-premises applications. It includes an intuitive web based integration designer for point and click integration between applications and a rich monitoring dashboard that provides real-time insight into the transactions, all running on a mature runtime platform on Oracle Public Cloud. ICS will help accelerate integration projects and significantly shorten the time-to-market through it's intuitive and simplified designer, an intelligent data mapper, and a library of adapters to connect to various applications.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Integration Cloud Service
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company21%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Computer Software Company16%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Retailer6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Large Enterprise86%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Talend and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 10 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 9 reviews. Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 7.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "Good flow design interface, scalable, and provides a good variety of connectors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex". Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, SAP Process Orchestration, Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Service Bus.

See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.