We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."The graphic user interface of Palo Alto is good and it's easy to configure."
"Scalable ATP solution that's quick to set up. It demonstrates good performance and stability."
"WildFire has been instrumental in blocking a number of new threats, before common desktop anti-virus tools were able to detect them."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten since we never faced any issues."
"It is the best device in comparison to other network products in the marketplace."
"The cloud-based services are a nice feature."
"The most valuable feature is the Automatic Verdict, to recognize whether something is a threat, or not."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks WildFire are the good URL and file analysis that uses artificial intelligence. It has different interfaces, such as rest, SMTP protocol, and HTTPS. The Security incidents and event management are very good. Additionally, there are many file types that are supported and there is no limit to the number of files it can handle simultaneously. It integrates well with SIEM solutions."
"The solution is open-source, easy to manage, and user-friendly making it easy for anyone to use."
"The initial setup, while not simple, is easier than other products."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides network segregation for server monitoring."
"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."
"The initial setup was very quick. The first time it was long because I didn't know it yet. I was only using Windows. The first time was very difficult because of the operating system."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"Zabbix is a cost-effective solution. We're a small organization with a few dozen devices to monitor, and it was available for free. We can see what we need. We haven't done an in-depth analysis on it, but we're currently okay with the product."
"The most valuable feature is the support for monitoring Cisco switches."
"When comparing this solution to others it is not as good overall."
"High availability features are lacking."
"The automation and responsiveness need improvement."
"I don't think it needs to improve anything, except maybe the speed to deploy the changes."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex, mainly due to the GUI console and management challenges."
"The price of WildFire should be reduced in order to make it more affordable for our customers."
"The cyber security visibility and forensics features to receive more information about incidents could improve in Palo Alto Networks WildFire."
"Management and web filtering can be improved. There should also be better reporting, particularly around web filtering."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"The solution needs to add remote features."
"There are not too much documentation or manuals. We found the tutorials very easy to understand but do not go deep enough in the use of Zabbix. We need more manuals, proper use, documentation, etc."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
"It could be more stable."
"The stability could be better."
"I had problems using Zabbix when working with SUSE Enterprise; many companies use SUSE."
"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."
Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 98 reviews. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Proofpoint Email Protection, Juniper SRX Series Firewall and Fortinet FortiSandbox, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.